Archive | November 2010

The Girly Nanny President sees himself — and us

when an earthquake strikes Haiti, Obama demands immediate action: “Make sure we are moving fast and aggressively he says. Obama’s self-regard is at its most resplendent when he delivers a remark attributed to Abraham Lincoln: “I am not bound to win, but I’m bound to be true. I’m not bound to succeed, but I’m bound to live up to what light I have.” The words are actually those of Ronald Reagan…I suggest get the man a Echa-sketch tele-prompter so he can change his mind easily, Just shake him and he erases.

The Democratic Socialists Of America Mayor Of Chicago

President Obama’s political mentor, and proud member of the Democratic Socialists of America, Danny Davis, So…who will President Obama support? His former political fixer who helped deliver the stimulus bill and Obamacare, Rahm Emanuel, or one of his political mentors, Danny Davis? No matter how this shakes out, Chicago’s going to have one hell of a choice to make – between a political thug/fixer and an open Socialist. The future is bright! and they were wailing about how dangerous/extremist/potentially violent Tea Partiers are.

Transparency; Where the Lies Begin

When it comes to “we the people” seeking more transparency that we might be better informed as to the actions, or inactions towards our needs being met, our elected officials have perfected the song and dance, smoke and mirrors routines of droning on and on, instead of providing a simple response to our queries.

This is not a congressional filibuster. This is simply a question of what have you done so far, what are your plans for the future, both immediate and long-term, in what ways to you intend to finance these goals, and to what end do they provide for us, both financially and in personal security.

Think of it as your boss doing a progress report on you, as to whether or not you deserve a raise or the boot. This is real life accountability to which you are hiding from the very people who can vote you back in.

Last I checked, in this country the government was, “of the people, by the people, for the people”. Nowhere does it say hide what you do, or control the people. Nowhere does it say take away from the people for your own personal greed. The commonwealth is not an alliterative term for spread the wealth.

You have proved with glaring results that you are unable to manage. Just look at all the committees, sub-committees, agencies, commissions and directors any initiative or idea has to go through before being brought to the house, and then the senate, and then finally the president. Talk about your filibuster! And along the way, there’s the smoke and mirrors committee, who have to tack on x amount of taxpayer dollars for lobbyists and/or special interest groups in order to approve the initial idea.

Is this the means by which you constantly feel you deserve a raise? Would you like to hear what the people think?

Yours is the only job wherein the people get to vote you in, but have absolutely no say in whether or not you deserve a raise. For this reason alone you should provide us with the means necessary to decide whether or not we should consider voting you back for another term.

If you would eliminate just some of the committees, sub-committees, agencies, and directors; by-pass all the lobbyists and special interest groups, and use common sense on the issue at hand, streamlining the process would lower the overall cost of the bill. And because this is so tangled, so convoluted, it has become an enormous breeding ground of corruption, waist, beauracratic red tape; diverting our energies and resources away from the necessities.

Perhaps we wouldn’t be so irate when you vote yourselves a raise, if we had the chance to see for ourselves, what each bill provides. (Providing of course the bill didn’t further erode our freedoms, or pockets, or jeopardize our security.)

As our elected officials, it is NOT your job to squeeze the life out of us, but rather provide us with the legal parameters in equality and justice, while providing security from any enemy, that we may flourish and prosper.

Is it too much to ask, that you show us you deserve to be voted back in? (And in all honesty, WE should be the ones to decide if you deserve a raise.)

North and South Korea Obama butts in.

OBAMA, if North and South Korea wants to fight, know this ” we fought that war once, I for one will not support you if you decide to defend either side, Vietnam still lives in many of our soldiers, many were spit on and called baby killers, also we were not allowed to do what was necessary to win. You’re not President enough for me to take up arms against any country, So Obama if you want to threaten these other countries then you put on a uniform take up arms and fight them your damn self.

No more of you sit in that white house and bark out orders while you jet around in Ghetto fashion.

They want to take your garden away.

The Senate recently passed Bill S 510, also known as the Food Safety Modernization Act. The bill, from the nickname, seems harmless enough, but this bill means more than its name implies. This bill will give the government jurisdiction over the growth, sale, trade and transport of foods in a way unlike any before. The passing of this bill would place full and total control over food into the hands of the federal government, and many people, farmers especially, are not happy about it. This new bill will place a great deal of authority over farmers, and even freelance gardeners simply growing fruits and vegetables in their own backyards.

Practices such as saving seeds for use the next year would be prohibited and doing so could result in a federal offense, punishable by fines and prison time. Some speculate that the practice of saving seeds is being banned in order to give seed companies, such as Monsanto, a monopoly over the seed industry. One of the biggest groups of people to suffer are farmers. Farmers who provide food for their own families, as well as sell their crops at farmer’s markets, will now be subjected to the authority of the federal government in regards to their crops, and the sale, and even personal consumption, of said crops. You heard right; it would be against the law to consume food grown in your own garden without the federal government’s approval. This bill affects not only the farmers, but gardening hobbyists, or those hoping to stretch their dollar and make ends meet with a summer garden. You could be committing a federal offense by enjoying some home-grown cucumbers, tomatoes or sweet peas. That apple tree that’s been in your backyard for the last decade? You better chop it down, because if you’re caught eating from it, you could face criminal charges. US Senate offices are experiencing a huge backlash of grassroots opposition to the bill — called the Food Safety Modernization Act — as virtually every health freedom organization, family farm group and even dietary supplement companies have aligned to oppose this new bill. It is being called “The most dangerous bill in United States history” and would thrust America into a new Dark Ages of FDA tyranny over seeds, foods, herbs, gardens and nutritional supplements. (…) 12/18/2009–Reported to Senate amended. FDA Food Safety Modernization Act – Title I – Improving Capacity to Prevent Food Safety Problems Section 101 – Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to inspect records related to food, including to: (1) allow the inspection of records of food that the Secretary reasonably believes is likely to be affected in a similar manner as an adulterated food; and (2) require that each person (excluding farms and restaurants) who manufactures, processes, packs, distributes, receives, holds, or imports an article of food permit inspection of his or her records if the Secretary believes that there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to such food will cause serious adverse health consequences or death. Section 102 – Authorizes the Secretary to suspend the registration of a food facility if the food manufactured, processed, packed, or held by a facility has a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. Section 103 – Requires each owner, operator, or agent in charge of a food facility to: (1) evaluate the hazards that could affect food; (2) identify and implement preventive controls; (3) monitor the performance of those controls; and (4) maintain records of such monitoring. Deems facilities required to comply with certain food-specific standards to be in compliance with this section. Requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations to establish science-based minimum standards for conducting a hazard analysis, documenting hazards, implementing preventive controls, and documenting such implementation. Prohibits the operation of a facility that manufactures, processes, packs, or holds food for sale in the United States if the owner, operator, or agent in charge of such facility is not in compliance with this section. Delays implementation of this section for small businesses. Section 104 – Directs the Secretary to: (1) review and evaluate relevant health data and other information to determine the most significant foodborne contaminants; and (2) issue contaminant-specific and science-based guidance documents, action levels, or regulations. Section 105 – Sets forth provisions related to produce safety, including to require the Secretary to: (1) establish science-based minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting of those types of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities to minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences or death; and (2) publish updated good agricultural practices and guidance for the safe production and harvesting of specific types of fresh produce. Section 106 – Requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations to protect against the intentional adulteration of food. Section 107 – Directs the Secretary to assess and collect fees related to: (1) food facility reinspection; (2) food recalls; (3) the voluntary qualified importer program; and (4) importer reinspection. Applies export certification provisions to food. Section 108 – Requires the Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture to prepare and submit to the relevant congressional committees and make public the National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy, which shall include: (1) an implementation plan; (2) a coordinated research agenda; and (3) a process to achieve, and evaluate progress towards, goals. Section 109 – Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) to report annually on the activities of the Food and Agriculture Government Coordinating Council and the Food and Agriculture Sector Coordinating Council. Section 110 – Requires the HHS Secretary to submit to Congress: (1) a comprehensive report that identifies programs and practices that are intended to promote the safety and supply chain security of food and to prevent outbreaks of foodborne illness and other food-related hazards that can be addressed through preventive activities; and (2) biennial reports on food safety programs and practices following the submission of the comprehensive report. Requires the HHS Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture to submit to Congress, biennially, a joint food safety and food defense research plan. Section 111 – Requires the HHS Secretary to promulgate regulations on sanitary transportation practices for the transportation of food. Section 112 – Requires the Secretary to develop and make available to local educational agencies, schools, early childhood education programs, and interested entities and individuals guidelines for developing plans for individuals to manage the risk of food allergy and anaphylaxis in schools and early childhood education programs, to be implemented on a voluntary basis. Sets forth issues for such guidelines to address, including: (1) parental obligation to provide documentation of their child’s food allergy; (2) the creation of an individual plan for food allergy management; (3) communication strategies between schools or childhood education programs and providers of emergency medical services; and (4) strategies to reduce the risk of exposure to anaphylactic causative agents in classrooms and common school or early childhood education program areas, such as cafeterias. Allows the Secretary to award matching grants to assist local educational agencies in implementing such food allergy and anaphylaxis management guidelines. Title II – Improving Capacity to Detect and Respond to Food Safety Problems Section 201 – Requires the Secretary to: (1) allocate resources to inspect facilities and articles of food imported into the United States based on their risk profiles; (2) increase the frequency of inspection of all facilities; and (3) report to the appropriate congressional committees annually on food facility and food import inspections. Section 202 – Requires the Secretary to: (1) recognize bodies that accredit laboratories with a demonstrated capability to conduct analytical testing of food products; (2) establish a publicly available registry of accreditation bodies; (3) develop model standards that an accreditation body shall require laboratories to meet; and (4) periodically reevaluate accreditation bodies and revoke recognition of any not in compliance with this section. Sets forth requirements for mandatory testing, including that: (1) testing be conducted by federal laboratories or accredited nonfederal laboratories; and (2) results of such testing be sent directly to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Requires the Secretary to review results from any sampling and testing that lead to a state or locality issuing a food recall to evaluate the need for a national recall or other compliance and enforcement activities. Requires the Secretary to report to the relevant congressional committees on the progress in implementing a national food emergency response laboratory network. Section 203 – Directs the DHS Secretary to maintain an agreement through which relevant laboratory network members will: (1) agree on common laboratory methods in order to facilitate the sharing of knowledge and information; (2) identify means by which each member could work cooperatively to optimize national laboratory preparedness and provide surge capacity during emergencies; and (3) engage in ongoing dialogue and build relationships that will support a more effective and integrated response during emergencies. Sets forth reporting requirements. Section 204 – Requires the HHS Secretary to: (1) improve tracking and tracing of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities in the event of a foodborne illness outbreak; and (2) establish standards for the type of information, format, and timeframe for persons to submit records to aid the Secretary in such tracking and tracing. Section 205 – Requires the Secretary to establish a pilot project to explore and evaluate methods for rapidly and effectively tracking and tracing processed food so that the Secretary may quickly identify the source of an outbreak involving such a processed food and the recipients of the contaminated food. Section 206 – Requires the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to enhance foodborne illness surveillance systems to improve the collection, analysis, reporting, and usefulness of data on foodborne illnesses. Requires the Secretary to: (1) develop and implement strategies to leverage and enhance the food safety and defense capacities of state and local agencies to achieve specified goals, including improving foodborne illness outbreak response and containment; and (2) complete a review of state and local capacities and needs for enhancement not later than one year after enactment of this Act. Reauthorizes appropriations for grants to states and Indian tribes to expand participation in networks to enhance federal, state, and local food safety efforts, including meeting the costs of establishing and maintaining the food safety surveillance, technical, and laboratory capacity needed for such participation. Section 207 – Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) provide a responsible party with an opportunity to cease distribution and recall an adulterated or misbranded article of food if the use of or exposure to such article will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals; (2) order a responsible party to immediately cease distribution and provide notice to relevant persons if the responsible party does not voluntarily cease distribution of or recall such article of food; and (3) order a recall if the Secretary determines that removal of the article from commerce is necessary, but only after providing an opportunity for a hearing. Section 208 – Revises the standard for the administrative detention of food to allow such a detention if the FDA has reason to believe that such article is adulterated or misbranded. Section 209 – Requires the Administration of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to provide support for, and technical assistance to, state, local, and tribal governments in preparing for, assessing, decontaminating, and recovering from an agriculture or food emergency. Section 210 – Requires the Secretary to set standards and administer training and education programs for the employees of state, local, territorial, and tribal food safety officials relating to the regulatory responsibilities and policies established by this Act. Authorizes and encourages the Secretary to conduct examinations, testing, and investigations for the purposes of determining compliance with the food safety provisions of this Act through the officers and employees of such state, local, territorial, or tribal agency. Section 211 – Expands the program for grants to states, territories, and Indian tribes for inspections to include grants to: (1) train to HHS standards for the examination, inspection, and investigation of food manufacturing, processing, packing, holding, distribution, and importation; (2) build the capacity of the laboratories for food safety; (3) build the infrastructure and capacity of the food safety programs; and (4) take appropriate action to protect the public health in response to a recall of food under the FFDCA. Title III – Improving the Safety of Imported Food Section 301 – Requires U.S. importers to perform risk-based foreign supplier verification activities to verify that imported food is produced in compliance with applicable requirements related to hazard analysis and standards for produce safety and is not adulterated or misbranded. Requires the Secretary to issue guidance to assist U.S. importers in developing foreign supplier verification programs. Section 302 – Requires the Secretary to: (1) establish a program to provide for the expedited review and importation of food offered for importation by U.S. importers who have voluntarily agreed to participate in such program; and (2) issue a guidance document related to participation and compliance with such program. Section 303 – Requires imported food that fails to meet requirements for a certification or other assurance that the food meets applicable FFDCA requirements to be refused admission. Authorizes the Secretary to require, as a condition of granting admission to an article of food into the United States, that an entity provide a certification or other assurances that the article of food complies with applicable FFDCA requirements. Section 304 – Directs the Secretary to require, prior to importation of an article of food, notice of any country to which such article has been refused entry. Section 305 – Requires the Secretary to determine whether a country can provide reasonable assurances that the food supply of the country meets or exceeds the safety of food manufactured, processed, packed, or held in the United States. Section 306 – Directs the Secretary to develop a comprehensive plan to expand the technical, scientific, and regulatory capacity of foreign governments and food industries from which foods are exported to the United States. Section 307 – Authorizes the Secretary to enter into arrangements and agreements with foreign governments to facilitate the inspection of registered foreign facilities. Requires the Secretary to direct resources to inspections of foreign facilities, supplies, and food types to help ensure the safety and security of the U.S. food supply. Requires food to be refused admission into the United States if permission to inspect the food facility is denied by the facility owner, operator, or agent or the foreign country. Section 308 – Sets forth provisions governing the establishment of a system to recognize bodies that accredit third-party auditors and audit agents to certify that eligible entities meet applicable FFDCA requirements for importation of food into the United States. Section 309 – Requires the Secretary to establish offices of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in foreign countries to provide assistance to the appropriate governmental entities with respect to measures to provide for the safety of articles of food and other products regulated by the FDA that are exported by such countries to the United States. Section 310 – Requires the Secretary to: (1) develop and implement a strategy to better identify sand prevent entry into the United States of smuggled food; and (2) notify the DHS Secretary not later than ten days after identifying a smuggled food that would cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. Requires a press release to warn consumers and vendors about a potential threat from smuggled food if certain requirements are met. Title IV – Miscellaneous Provisions Section 401 – Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2014 for the activities of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, the Center for Veterinary Medicine, and related field activities in the Office of Regulatory Affairs of the FDA. Directs the HHS Secretary to increase the field staff of such Centers and Office. Section 402 – Establishes whistleblower protections for employees of entities involved in the manufacturing, processing, packing, transporting, distribution, reception, holding, or importation of food who provide information relating to any violation of the FFDCA. Section 404 – Declares that nothing in this Act shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party. Section 405 – Requires the Secretary to update the Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards and Control Guidance to take into account advances in technology. Section 406 – Requires the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, to study the transportation of food for consumption in the United States, including an examination of the unique needs of rural and frontier areas with regard to the delivery of safe food.

Selling off America..Repost

A new television ad about the U.S. national debt produced by Citizens Against Government Waste has been deemed “too controversial” by major networks including ABC, A&E and The History Channel and will not be shown on those channels.

Manipulation or PC (politically correct)

In the world today, “politically correct” has evolved into the Achilles heal of the human race. No longer is it politically correct to clearly define right from wrong; good from evil. Left from right.

If I am free to be me, and you are free to be you, how can I be made to tolerate you, with no reciprocative tolerance to be expected from you? How can I offend, but not be offended?

I have heard, “It’s a matter of interpretation.” So, one man’s wrong, is another man’s right? Evil can be a good thing? Who should decide?

The only thing to have been clarified by this term is that we, as a species, have abandoned our own moral compass. No other living thing on this planet is more devoid of its very nature. Indeed it would seem, the more intelligent and intellectual one gets, the more diabolical and deceptive of their nature, they become. Seeking not what is just and righteous, but what can be acquired through manipulation.

It has become a game of one-up-manship. While defining in sympathetic terms, relieving one of their indignation, or perhaps even their worldly possessions, is the goal.

As if standing on a magnetic field, our moral compass is no longer able to guide us back. Ironically, it will take manipulation to relieve ourselves of this burdensome term.

In being politically correct, we exchanged our morals and better judgment, for tolerance and deception.